01: Physician Communication and Patient Adherence to Treatment: A Meta-analysis


Advancing behavior management for chronic care visits is essential and will help improve the way in which different processes are established realistically and practically. A professional approach to handling issues is critical in ensuring a more specific commitment to addressing the necessary commitment protocols.

 

The hospital setting needs to be managed well to ensure no notion of struggle is evident in any given context. It’s imperative to look for a way to improve patient-physician communication as the leading platform in defining healthcare practices. There are protocols to follow in the event of chronic care visits in the hospital setting. All that’s really required is to optimize the wellbeing of the patients. Better communication is required in offering patients the services they warrant in any context. There’s a need to advance the best techniques essential in connecting patients and the physician as well as the family and community in healthcare facilities. 

 

There’s a strong interest in pathways to help establish the necessary protocols to develop and realize the most effective procedures to follow. It’s all about selecting critical options in setting the course of communication and interactions at all levels. In essence, the principal mandate would be to look for a platform to enhance core measures of commitment in defining the course of action at every point of communication. A realistic tactic to help connect with patients at the individual level, as well as the greater scope, is always welcomed. 

 

The patient-physician relationship is essential in ensuring treatment and care delivery success. One concept that stands out is the integration of proper communication between physician and patient on how to consume medications. It is easy to educate the patient on efficient ways to manage medication and drug administration when there’s a favorable level of communication. The end goal is a robust strategy to realize interactions and communications. One should look for a way to improve how patients can conduct their interactions with their immediate environment and the level of care they receive. 

 

Using professional communication strategies is tantamount to building the necessary infrastructure for good chronic disease care. It’s important to understand the immediate and surrounding professional environment to unearth the most realistic ways of grasping the different needs of patients. The primary approach is to create a level of success in interacting with patients as a physician to optimize care delivery. Adherence to policies and regulations in a hospital setting will work as a standard interface in the integration of professional procedures that have the power to influence how systems work. 

 

Chronic care visits need to be regulated to influence the ability of a patient to have peace and hope of healing. Evidence-based practices in this setting must be optimal and functional to ensure it will be possible to raise the bar of efficiency in every context for streamlined management of patients. The leading concern is how family and friends behave in front of patients under chronic care in the wards. The course of communication has to foster adherence to the set evidence-based practices in the light of patients with chronic medical conditions. It may not be possible to address the specific issues that align with the course of action in every context. One way to tackle the issue, in the long run, is to improve care delivery for patients suffering from protracted complications. 


Health Equity Explored

A realistic tool to bring health equity to the “footsteps” of chronic care is effective communication strategy training for physicians. It may not be possible to attain success in creating health equity without first defining the most appropriate approach to use in training physicians in the best way to improve communication skills. It’s imperative to seek out the most idyllic options to better connect patients and physicians. Outcome-based solutions are essential in fashioning patient acceptance of the direction they receive in its entirety. The main idea is to fortify the relationships between professional healthcare workers and patients. 

 

Patients feel part of the treatment process they receive when they see their space's value in the hospital setting. The balance and equity required in any setting must be evident over time. The primary connection between the course of care and adherence to the success of medication is the ability of the care providers to communicate elaborately. The challenge patients face that forces them to neglect instructions is failing to identify with the immediate environment that talks more about the service delivery at each point in time. Significant are the attributes that ensure steps are taken to address the imbalances that may surface from health inequity in due course. 

 

Understanding “health's” cultural, social, and economic determinants will help the physician communicate professionally with patients, family, and other healthcare workers. It will make it easier to pinpoint health gaps. The best strategy is to look for an appropriate plan to cover all patients’ needs. All told, proper health equity should involve better communication skills for optimal, evidence-based care and patient-physician interactions. 


Physician Wellbeing

The wellness of physicians is essential in ascertaining the outcomes of care in any hospital setting. Preferably, one would ensure all practices help optimize patients' health in any given setting. The primary approach is to define how healthcare workers' health is managed to avoid burnout and other serious concerns. Connecting with the needs of doctors is a small way to contribute to the necessary measures that bring out the best in any given healthcare firm. It may not be possible to define physicians' behavior unless there’s a platform that looks at their welfare. 

Engineering a conducive working environment for physicians will diminish burnout and negativity that unfortunately bear low satisfaction levels. The pivotal idea here is to establish a way through which all issues linked to physician wellbeing are communicated correctly by healthcare systems and addressed in real-time. Physician wellbeing ensures working environment requirements are met correctly.


Invaluable Communication

Effective communication is the only way to manage a hospital's chronic patient care environment. Better strategies must be adopted to ensure all the required plans for a comfortable chronic care environment are in place. Efficient communication between physicians and patients, as well as with family members, has to be augmented. The courses of action ought to be in such a manner that makes it possible to address each issue in a real-time approach and resolve areas of conflict amicably. The main hurdles of communication can, of course, be resolved alongside other smaller issues concerning patient-healthcare professional communication.


The Wrap-Up

Communication is the cornerstone of all processes in both inpatient/hospital and outpatient/private practice settings. Patient-physician communication has to be moderated by integrating critical approaches that offer an evidence-based way of solving issues affecting all parties. Patient care and medication adherence are only possible if better communication skills are mastered. 


The needs of patients and physicians are manageable through a sincere commitment to improving the welfare of both physicians and their respective patients. Some would argue that it’s easy to address health equity discrepancies the moment multiple issues are addressed concurrently. The management of chronic care visits is a product of influencing health behaviors. 

 

Amah Health offers its learners a continuing education-credited online course to help healthcare professionals learn about effective patient communication. Visit our course page to contact us or enroll today.


Dr. Naheed Ali, MD, PhD, is a physician by education and a writer by choice since 2005. He earned an MD degree in 2008 and later completed Harvard Medical School's lifestyle medicine training in 2012, before obtaining a PhD in holistic health elsewhere in 2013. He brings more than 15 years of experience writing remotely and has more than 15 years of health-related publications to his credit. 


  1. Zolnierek, K. B. H., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2009). Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis. Medical care, 47(8), 826.
  2. Silver J, Bean A, Slocum C, et al. Physician Workforce Disparities and Patient Care: A Narrative Review. Health Equity. 2019;3(1):360-377.
  3. Haskard Zolnierek K, DiMatteo M. Physician Communication and Patient Adherence to Treatment. Med Care. 2009;47(8):826-834.
  4. Castillo E, Isom J, DeBonis K, Jordan A, Braslow J, Rohrbaugh R. Reconsidering Systems-Based Practice: Advancing Structural Competency, Health Equity, and Social Responsibility in Graduate Medical Education. Academic Medicine. 2020;95(12):1817-1822.
  5. Browne A, Varcoe C, Ford-Gilboe M, et al. Disruption as an opportunity: Impacts of an organizational health equity intervention in primary care clinics. Int J Equity Health. 2018;17(1).
  6. Silver J, Bean A, Slocum C, et al. Physician Workforce Disparities and Patient Care: A Narrative Review. Health Equity. 2019;3(1):360-377.
  7. Zolnierek KB, Dimatteo MR. Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis. Med Care. 2009 Aug;47(8):826-34.




02: The relationship between physician communication and older patients' diabetes self-management and glycemic control


As #healthcareprofessionals, everyone has noticed how complex medicine has become in the 21st century. Rapid changes in technology and pharmaceuticals have not only improved healthcare but have also made it harder to fully understand. Indeed, in some specialties, this complex knowledge is only understood by a limited group of practitioners. If medical information and keeping up with the ever-evolving complexities seems difficult for health care providers, imagine how much more complicated medicine may seem to patients.


In addition, patients must balance the ins-and-outs of managing one or more chronic conditions. Effective self-management not only requires patients to manage their medications but may also mean changing a lifetime of habits of diet and exercise, self-monitoring glucose or blood pressure or peak flow, and making daily adjustments to life due to the impact of their conditions and fluctuating symptoms. When patients do not have a clear understanding of their medical conditions and why specific health behaviors are needed, it may feel as if they are facing an uphill, and even a losing, battle.


Another obstacle to overcome is the limited face time clinicians have with each patient. Sitting and listening to patient concerns is often pushed aside for administrative tasks, like updating electronic health records, scheduling, and handling insurance and financial issues. Given the many competing demands at each office visit, providers must effectively communicate information about diseases, answers patients’ concerns, and help support patients' self-management behaviors, usually in a very small window of time.


At this point, you might be wondering, what is to be done about this conundrum?


The answers lie in effective communication. Research shows that when #primarycare providers involve their patients in treatment decisions, patients achieve better outcomes. Patients with chronic diseases, such as diabetes, who help set their own medical goals and have input into their own treatments, have better outcomes. Patient involvement throughout the process is especially helpful in complex self-care behaviors, like improving blood glucose control. In fact, higher patient self-ratings of their diabetes self-management have been shown to be significantly associated with lower glycosylated hemoglobin levels, a long-standing biomarker of glucose control.


Patients’ participation in the decision-making process is not the only factor that contributes to better outcomes. Studies have shown that when practitioners provide repeated and thorough information about the health conditions, patients with diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease have better overall self-management. In diabetes, for instance, providing more information and explaining to patients why foot care and taking medications are important appear to be more important to patients than shared-decisions about self-care. Studies show that for more simple self-management behaviors in diabetes, like foot care, providing thorough information is effective. But, for more complex and personal self-care behaviors, such as diet and exercise changes, involving patients in the decision-making process is more important. Even though both shared decision-making and providing comprehensive information are both strongly associated with patients’ overall self-management, the relative importance of each varies according to the particular health care behavior and desired patient outcome. Incorporating detailed information about the patients’ condition(s), explaining why certain behaviors and lifestyle changes are necessary, and involving patients in deciding about their own treatment plans are equally important components of good communication.


Good communication also leads to more trust and motivation. Trust in the medical system does not only involve trusting the #healtcareprover, but it also includes trust in the health-related information, the health care system, pharmaceutical companies, the public health officials, and even the government. That’s a lot of trust! Fortunately, research consistently shows that patients trust their primary care providers more than most others. When physicians take enough time to get to know their patients and see each as an individual, the patient is willing to trust not just the physician but also any health information that is provided during office visits.


Unfortunately, in a typical 20-minute office visit, less than 1 minute is spent discussing treatments and setting goals with patients. Even more worrisome, research shows that during more than half of outpatient visits, providers do not ask if patients have questions. Consequently, up to half of patients leave their medical visits without understanding what their physician told them to do. Studies show that when patients are more knowledgeable about their prescribed treatment regimens and understand the benefits, they successfully incorporate them into daily life. So, back to our conundrum of effective communication.


What is the best way is to provide information? Should clinicians simply tell patients what they need to do? Yes, in some cases, particularly for simple behaviors, like foot care in diabetes. For other more complex self-management tasks, clinicians should explain to patients the rationale for their advice, for example, among patients with asthma, checking peak flow daily will show if the medication is working properly. Furthermore, exploring patient goals and preferences before giving any treatment recommendations will give patients ownership in the process and provide motivation for better self-management.


Active participation is key. By actively participating, patients share their concerns, lifestyle preferences, and personal priorities with their clinicians. The resulting treatment regimen will be individually tailored to their needs, values, and goals. Involving patients in the decision-making process increases their motivation and gives them confidence to carry out any complex self-care regimens. Patients who set their own treatment goals will have a sense of personal control. They will be more likely to make choices based on realistic expectations.


Strategies such as encouraging patients to repeat in their own words what was just told to them are effective in ensuring the patient understands the information. When physicians link the recommended behaviors to the patient's individual health concerns, past experiences, and social situations, the communication becomes even more effective. It’s not just about explaining how the recommended behaviors will affect the patients in the future, but about how they will affect the patients now. Describing treatment options and alternatives, explaining any possible side effects and complications, and giving plenty of information will actively involve the patient. Providing clear written directions about self-management tasks, especially for older patients who are often taking multiple medications and have complicated self-care regimens is another good communication strategy.


The good news is that effective evidence-based communication tools and skills are available. And, as all good health care providers know, skills can be learned. Communication skills include health coaching and persuasive messaging. Health coaching uses techniques learned in the coaching world to encourage personalized plans and helping patients understanding the whole disease and why certain behaviors are more helpful than others. Being a health coach is like being a personal health cheerleader. This kind of encouragement will boost patients’ confidence and lead to better health outcomes. Incorporating persuasive messages can help physicians frame their messages for the best possible outcome. For example, do you think it’s more persuasive to say a particular drug had a 90% success rate or that it had a 10% failure rate? Or is it better to focus on short-term or long-term consequences?


Effective communication, especially in the care of our patients with chronic conditions, is absolutely crucial for improved patient outcomes. Remember, clinicians must not only communicate what they do, but why they do it. Physicians must spend sufficient time with each patient and better explain how medicine works and the central roles that both physicians and patients play to improve patient health. Together, we can do it.


If you need help with health coaching, more effective time management, how to incorporate persuasive messaging, and improve your overall communication strategies, don’t hesitate to contact Amah health for its evidence-based health communication #medicaleducation.


  1. Heisler, M., Cole, I., Weir, D., Kerr, E. A., & Hayward, R. A. (2007). Does physician communication influence older patients' diabetes self-management and glycemic control? Results from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 62(12), 1435-1442.
  2. Berman AC, Chutka DS. Assessing effective physician-patient communication skills: "Are you listening to me, doc?". Korean J Med Educ. 2016 Jun;28(2):243-249.
  3. Linzer M, Neprash H, Brown R, et al.; Healthy Work Place Investigators. Where trust flourishes: perceptions of clinicians who trust their organizations and are trusted by their patients. Ann Fam Med. 2021 Nov-Dec;19(6):521-526.
  4. Shen AK, Tan ASL. Trust, influence, and community: Why pharmacists and pharmacies are central for addressing vaccine hesitancy. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2022 Jan-Feb;62(1):305-308.
  5. Tai-Seale M, McGuire TG, Zhang W. Time allocation in primary care office visits. Health Serv Res. 2007 Oct;42(5):1871-1894.
  6. Yen PH, Leasure AR. Use and effectiveness of the teach-back method in patient education and health outcomes. Fed Pract. 2019 Jun;36(6):284-289.